From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  6 12:39:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F5037B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  6 Aug 2003 12:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.yumyumyum.org (dsl092-171-091.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[66.92.171.91])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF87D43F93
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  6 Aug 2003 12:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from culverk@yumyumyum.org)
Received: by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 3ACB244B; Wed,  6 Aug 2003 15:39:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3657344A; Wed,  6 Aug 2003 15:39:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:39:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kenneth Culver <culverk@yumyumyum.org>
To: webmaster@bmyster.com
In-Reply-To: <1147.66.63.97.2.1060198261.squirrel@bmyster.com>
Message-ID: <20030806153904.N40140@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
References: <BB569408.194BE%mksmith@noanet.net>
	<20030806143214.F40140@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
	<1147.66.63.97.2.1060198261.squirrel@bmyster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Question concerning dual-NIC configuration
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:39:55 -0000

> why would ya want to route lo1 127.0.0.1 to a 192.x.x. address ???
> seems to me that there are to many system side processes that listen or
> ocmmunicate thru that...giving access or routing that traffic to a
> internal address ...doesnt seem to smart to me.

This is basically what I just said.

Ken