Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:09:22 +0000 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please rebuild all ports that depend on PNG Message-ID: <CAN6yY1ttzjA0Y4FJfGTitQcS9hvNDH_K9Lg9KRyUw1SBiEv=TQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120602140703.004264ea@scorpio> References: <CAGFTUwMo51dWxM2p4STaqt-=NjzEuUH5U6nmbiuzVMtK6_W3dQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120602122658.0f86debc@scorpio> <CADLo8388dHiEZCxdXz9A=Ur5qPVzcfbxh43ZGgzfkbWk9r%2B%2BJg@mail.gmail.com> <20120602140703.004264ea@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:34:59 +0100 > Chris Rees articulated: > >>On Jun 2, 2012 5:27 PM, "Jerry" <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 11:07:28 -0400 >>> b. f. articulated: >>> >>> >> > Realy no other possibility?! >>> >> >>> >> You need to rebuild all the ports that install binaries that link >>> >> against libpngNN.so.NN. =A0That is actually a subset of the ports >>> >> that depend on graphics/png -- unfortunately it takes some effort >>> >> to identify precisely what does need rebuilding. =A0There is the >>> >> pkg_libchk script (which is part of sysutils/bsdadminscripts) that >>> >> can help. >>> >... >>> >> Use pkg_libchk to prioritise the ports that really need to be >>> >> rebuilt. >>> > >>> >Lawrence Stewart's convenient script can be used with portmaster to >>> >perform this kind of update: >>> > >>> >https://lauren.room52.net/hg/scripts/raw-file/tip/libdepend/libdepend.= sh >>> >>> I am receiving a: "This Connection is Untrusted" warning from Firefox >>> when I attempt to connect to that URL. It is probably harmless; >>> however, it certainly doesn't instill confidence is someone viewing >>> the site for the first time. >>> >> >>It just means he hasn't bought a certificate- no less trustworthy than >>vanilla (non-SSL) http. > > IMHO, if you are going to use "https" then you should have a proper SSL > certificate. A self-signed one means virtually nothing. If the web site > operator is not going to purchase an authentic certificate they why > use SSL at all? Just my 2=A2 on the matter. No, it means that the transfer is encrypted. There is no guarantee that the site you are downloading from is the site you thought you were, but many people like to do https as a matter of principle. For this, self-signed certs are fine. And, if you think think a valid cert really guarantees anything other than encryption, you have not been paying attention to the news. There are lots of bogus, but properly signed certs out there. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1ttzjA0Y4FJfGTitQcS9hvNDH_K9Lg9KRyUw1SBiEv=TQ>