From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Jun 16 21:57:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9383366D6 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49mhrl5h3tz3YQf for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:57:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unrelenting.technology; s=default; t=1592344656; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1mhnubiVUQScGsFuZHVsqYbdg/da9VeeamWAJ+PnuDk=; b=EF95hVl93bG9E+d41OTe4aJ6QmIC+yGRKopcrBm/lBRo+uavbe4StqZKMWC0kxF3YsL/XW XhKUjDBchw5T8181UDBphh367CMlK/gfK6CFJ5xVCyaQLx7foo+rI0fRtOJ7z248eh2c0L 14kg/4FnmcsX11Ii+R6cRS+okrPvy0Q= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: myfreeweb To: Dan Kotowski CC: freebsd-arm Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Layerscape/QorIQ LX2160X In-Reply-To: References: <32d1c173d986884efb9b28932c0ead52@unrelenting.technology> <5e1b4bfe845e62bbcd8b827fa37f2b98@unrelenting.technology> <940a6099e971e01bd6d04564d0982b9d@unrelenting.technology> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49mhrl5h3tz3YQf X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=unrelenting.technology header.s=default header.b=EF95hVl9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=unrelenting.technology; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of greg@unrelenting.technology designates 91.121.223.63 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=greg@unrelenting.technology X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.62 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.96)[-0.960]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[unrelenting.technology:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:91.121.223.63]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[unrelenting.technology:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[unrelenting.technology,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.67)[-0.667]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[91.121.223.63:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:57:45 -0000 On June 16, 2020 9:38:34 PM UTC, Dan Kotowski wrote: >> AHCI is looking better and better! >> I'm going to do a little bit of poking at that >> SATA HDD just to see how stable it really is=2E > >Well, it's definitely stable enough for lab use, that's a bonus=2E I caus= ed myself a few headaches by doing stupid things that caused a series of pa= nics, but all are easily attributed to human errata=2E=2E=2E > >Oddly the i2c bus is gone - any ideas what we changed that caused it to d= isappear? > >https://gist=2Egithub=2Ecom/agrajag9/03d9f2f52084ef0ae1e64cbba190e062 > >If I'm reading the DSDT correctly, then it should be hanging right off ac= pi0=2E We can even see it in an older dmesg=2Eboot: > >i2c0: iomem 0x2000000-0x20= 0ffff irq 7 on acpi0 > >But now, nothing=2E=2E=2E Probably because I deleted that i2c acpi attachment at some point, because= it didn't seem to actually work=2E=20 >Aside - since the builtin netifs are basically useless for us, any sugges= tions on USB wifi dongles? I tried a few from my parts piles, but all of th= em were unstable Realtek trash=2E I know Atheros chips are usually a good b= et in Linux land - does that hold true in FreeBSD as well? Not sure how common Atheros is on USB=2E=2E Ralink is fine I think? Actual= ly Realtek wifi shouldn't be unusable too=2E=2E For USB Ethernet though, I recommend the "Nintendo Switch compatible" ASIX= chips (axge)=2E By the way, did you get any different firmware builds in the meantime? Tha= t don't have everything suspiciously routed to the SMMU in IORT=2E=2E