From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 22 22:20:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7050F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:20:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E2043D2F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:20:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com)
Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69])
	by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBMMKnUX017569
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:20:48 -0800
Message-ID: <00CDF9AA240E204FA6E923BD35BC643607C48075@bcs-mail.internal.cacheflow.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: question on tcp_syn_backoff
Thread-Index: AcTodF1NQbGjgNagRRq5q9izR6NWDg==
From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
To: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28
Subject: question on tcp_syn_backoff
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:20:50 -0000


	I'm trying to understand the logics behind tcp_syn_backoff.

	Was this a change associated with
     =20
      revision 1.40
      date: 2001/02/26  authro: jlemon

	Does this change have anything to do with RFC-3390 ?

	-- Qing