From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 12 00:45:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6451065725 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swun2010@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f202.google.com (mail-pz0-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4098FC1A for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so866827pzk.7 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:45:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kFj9dLx0E6rsBJFU/3t7ikUZOwXjWLg1O2Mtrv0ZaNc=; b=F7sx1mzUWYxqeyA8fmOs2j/2RBVKEbVw7wHCeUshy6MRVs7lot+6IrjX2PGbxBPn+A vQLFgEPcn0t38MhOVLtJL/fzjFP0teMMEPJC9P6s6msurI+e0ky/Wns1kuU+vf0HZ6Zb u9rzKYhzUlyyMgISNw8ow25xTVWrlsDWY0VT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MRF67w5YHPGipwtVcV7iMk9f8H0biuuwMhXotgiq7yOYHfjvGQ4JNHhW6SDonKZmlM VEuPgj3+wzbAonhrJHqHfI48iAuty7qR8LKnoxjtWYMHnV1Te4gYuO7wzHcSktyDKs5X 80WJBSh59OGCbY77l0z/noWJEaNM+6Z55yhX4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.214.27 with SMTP id r27mr9653931rvq.286.1263257114646; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:45:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <736c47cb1001102049v71757b78oe954fd39f9d03118@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:45:14 +1100 Message-ID: <736c47cb1001111645v41e87672i201493ece1eb4ab0@mail.gmail.com> From: Sam Wun To: Gavin Atkinson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd for Sun Fire X4250 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:45:22 -0000 Hi Gavin, The reason I want to stick with i386 is because about few years ago when I tried AMD release of FreeBSD, it didn't have the same level of proficiency as i386 release of FreeBSD - packagThat was my impression at that time. I hope it has changed in this years. Is there any major installation difference between AMD (64) and i386 release of FreeBSD (8.0)? Thank you for your answers. Sam On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Sam Wun wrote: >> This server is built with Xeon cpu processor, Intel based. >> Can FreeBSD 8+ fully compatible with this server like those ordinary >> Intel i386 machine? > > Although it's hard to say (the Sun website doesn't realy give enough spec > details), I'd be surprised if it doesn't work. =A0FreeBSD runs very nicel= y > on every Intel- and amd64-based Sun machine I've tried it on. > > You'll almost certainly want to use the FreeBSD amd64 release rather than > i386, and I'd probably recommend 8.0-RELEASE, although 7.2 should work > fine. > > By the way, this is the wrong list for questions like this: if you have > any others, you're probably best off directing them to > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > > Gavin >