From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 00:36:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB4316A41F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:36:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7316A43D5E for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:35:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAN0ZSsB066783; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:35:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jAN0ZRMQ066780; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:35:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:35:25 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20051122234732.GA64700@flame.pc> Message-ID: <20051123013343.C66337@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051123001005.E37502@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051122234732.GA64700@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD GENERIC kernel&modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:36:09 -0000 >> # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. >> device bpf # Berkeley packet filter > > Pretty lean kernel configuration. It's impossible for the GENERIC > kernel though to satisfy everyone, for various reasons. what i mean is to change generic kernel in FreeBSD releases. my generic kernel will satisfy more users, and in most cases there is only need to rebuild one or a few modules with some added options. i think kernel modules was invented exactly for this. and loader.conf is an excellent thing! if kernels have to keep most things in it, so why having modules at all?