From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 6 17:38:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF573106564A for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834C98FC08 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so6235164vbb.13 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mIKF0AB4gGQhsMIQ8ibZah4k1K6hcFfG3DtV/Pvo4Wo=; b=jUEa3uUUObVIHWbGj/Z8P/SA2KsyaqnKbEv8Y8+oeLSqTmlj6e/hXOenFfA37T9uNY BdjQ5VcVMCaBjW240Fw2pNMZolc2BSQBH0HLwoxDRUxp3HOpQqFPOfPbrWgtYjBOKVin B6kO0lr4zRJj6sd4scA5erc52/5zxkx4o8MAY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.29.11 with SMTP id f11mr2203526vdh.66.1328549910781; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:38:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.181.4 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:38:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <413B1A6F-B076-4F50-90EA-7E17CF4B6E36@digsys.bg> References: <4F2FF72B.6000509@pean.org> <20120206162206.GA541@icarus.home.lan> <4F300CEA.5000901@fuckner.net> <413B1A6F-B076-4F50-90EA-7E17CF4B6E36@digsys.bg> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:38:30 -0800 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: Daniel Kalchev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HPC and zfs. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:38:31 -0000 On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Michael Fuckner wrote: >> Another thing to think about is CPU: you probably need weeks for a rebui= ld of a single disk in a Petabyte Filesystem- I haven't tried this with ZFS= yet, but I'm really interested if anyone already did this. > > This is where ZFS will shine. Depending on how you stripe disks, you can = either get super fast resilver (if you go for stripe of mirrors), to fast (= if you go for small number of disks raidz) to reasonable (if you of for lar= ge number of disks raidz). If you need high TPS you will want to go with mi= rrors anyway. > > The thing is doable with commodity hardware, but I wonder how one ever ba= ckups such setup? With a second box configured similarily. :) Although, trying to find "downtime" to do the backups ... --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com