Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:29:29 +1000
From:      John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
To:        "Richard P. Williamson" <richard.williamson@u4eatech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades)
Message-ID:  <20040609082929.GA15481@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040609090515.0270ff60@cygnus>
References:  <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200406081019.30500.kstewart@owt.com> <20040608175255.GA4309@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <40C61BBF.2080008@Pandora.Be> <6.1.0.6.2.20040609090515.0270ff60@cygnus>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:10:46AM +0100, Richard P. Williamson wrote:
> Theory:  Windoze installations are unreliable.
> Proof:
>   I turned it on.
>   It was hacked into an open proxy.
>   It contracted several hundred worms.
>   It crashed.
> QED.

W^5

(Which was what we wanted)

-- 
John Birrell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040609082929.GA15481>