Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:29:29 +1000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: "Richard P. Williamson" <richard.williamson@u4eatech.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades) Message-ID: <20040609082929.GA15481@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040609090515.0270ff60@cygnus> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200406081019.30500.kstewart@owt.com> <20040608175255.GA4309@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <40C61BBF.2080008@Pandora.Be> <6.1.0.6.2.20040609090515.0270ff60@cygnus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:10:46AM +0100, Richard P. Williamson wrote: > Theory: Windoze installations are unreliable. > Proof: > I turned it on. > It was hacked into an open proxy. > It contracted several hundred worms. > It crashed. > QED. W^5 (Which was what we wanted) -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040609082929.GA15481>