From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 20:13:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A079FF83; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [50.0.150.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E303FF3; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.9.1.83] (69-12-170-18.dedicated.static.sonic.net [69.12.170.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AKDTSO068256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:13:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Subject: nagios vs w/uptime Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_63F9795C-39BF-4C48-B401-0B2AB0D52E0B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <54DA617A.4090309@wemm.org> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:13:23 -0800 Message-Id: References: <54DA617A.4090309@wemm.org> To: Peter Wemm X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_63F9795C-39BF-4C48-B401-0B2AB0D52E0B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 [Moving to current@] On Feb 10, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Peter Wemm wrote: > Surprises: > * nagios doesn't like w / uptime anymore. libxo perhaps? Seems most likely, although I haven=E2=80=99t seen any differences in = output in my (admittedly limited) testing. In what way does Nagios not like w/uptime? Any concrete errors, output or misbehavior? Ideally: can you reproduce the problem? -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net --Apple-Mail=_63F9795C-39BF-4C48-B401-0B2AB0D52E0B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU2mZkAAoJEIda8t8f0tjjgmcQAKBe/xa0t/FRRKFGNlMeU0nd 4CldRzndpyyCir9dy0JgY6d4hytPoZNK+E/I5H14e3uOxpbVR1PTCuxBGbAn4PNl Jtw6JH09jd7w9ulHNJI81sxjX6B7Hzte/+WTuDlDzBICf5CtfBz+95rfetJiTurq yXXIkzw6if2iHUI+uAY6Qw8WeezlLvW9NyfreHljeB67YxvW8ZAAf2V0ZzEm0UNl j0Zk5YspR0/vpGTyOkSvLPpVCCK2Ix7nucvmpJeMkkuWnNFoUk4dcDYXpOVuZmK0 dGut5mVUdqTv90EE8wY6+p+eAizHvwPTesCh3KCLcQ1XLeWv/DMKld36W/Q80qYG mpzVaY0hUWXkCy44vHlWJhhslcNnT7yoWS5itJO51i3nWUhL90lmZDdRiA6KIldN y/7QAfuieFJSbWYG/wwZjZa4vljtWAcanLWnYIWirwVtk+fHkQYGTASkjMQk/YF3 N6cYAWcS21P8ptx7kUimyGrXDLkNeCMB6eZ0pjZ6pAgVVsi4FaGUlB+La7KyNGAc WzvD/626cmOmJwKT1DNfNetsTv38SI+5OF5nSZFAOHRKEEg06ADdZ555D2EQOHCD EVoDqSpUgipGt3C73ycWph6Yp4maJR2QQGPTDCaAmff/O0oPbXIO2lgALktZTfLm NFknNW+hWARll4N+Y7x5 =jISM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_63F9795C-39BF-4C48-B401-0B2AB0D52E0B--