Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:39:20 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> To: fbsd@www.zefox.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found Message-ID: <CAJuc1zPL1P%2B6KguMHm9Zswb4UxnqodZmG6njKY29f9GdYA-XVw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181119235722.GA53159@www.zefox.net> References: <20181119235722.GA53159@www.zefox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 13:25, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: [...] > Is there a resolution to this dilemma, other than just waiting for > inkscape to catch up? Is it possible to determine which revision of > the ports tree can make a runnable version of a particular port? The correct thing to do is to build a set of local package repository for your RPI3 system using synth or poudriere. It appears that some of your locally installed packages are out of sync with the ports-tree, and that is a common problem with using non-chrooted/jailed port-builders. I've just built a runnable version of inkscape, so I'm pretty sure the problem is at your end rather than the ports tree. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJuc1zPL1P%2B6KguMHm9Zswb4UxnqodZmG6njKY29f9GdYA-XVw>