From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Nov 20 02:39:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553ED113A020 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 02:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5598473D19 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 02:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id e7so231635vsc.2 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:39:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kLKD3bKOVyMqUj0lzZxOhD5Fgu9C1gITDTBpdMUQB2Y=; b=lpLvSRowpbqj2cOMqptlpyxve6/IBi33jKPCzmFYhoWnsMbEMDbk2QCmeeikgkS6h9 Ye2lkuCabqsChrWRMMpoQUYtRLPhtDPD9lOxzMc7kRtcdvKW93qZC/FBHyG+6lugjTf1 atXU8oC34yXs0i8T07ODYjWTr5g4Ao2HS2o93sZOwoQcI10s2cDrpYqM1JngASCHytD9 ZhyKKxyr2ghWryavGZ8UiUoC4JLcnXa/qr03uDGpCBQU5h5XuNPaihNq1vziM62CekNQ KA+mAIoKak6J6WxMbjIGJjGzTGNULlJDzY8px5lcGRyX5GuogtzKGZ8Bbdj8q7XgnhO3 fXrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kLKD3bKOVyMqUj0lzZxOhD5Fgu9C1gITDTBpdMUQB2Y=; b=B690mPJMD96tNtEKR/vBgoMsTG/ODxVm9/CmeMTTXjl1bo/YE6tOD7/n2d3IrbPj6x X1ZC6oX4aclrdgRE1H2fO6cSlt1NobTP82ke/9OsmmS5T3g4LUFCsx8QvjWotNuI1jOS YUg17kySGxUyoe43J1MFwOHP2NUna1m4/GZGwheQf/hCaIelhQyUsUDVMPds9I/MCr9F bMI6//TFMtetFCtfOvacrPKEz6R5CjXA8KJgCPSdRr6pootOQeQu3nl6TlYB8OR0ucyZ yTuy5EG38KJibbXnCOx7pYgUUv/VVa4KgDhnNNUhNlHWji5utVkDnrpgEXSD2gUE6fDx OzQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLcw8CdHYsnmJOp6Eq5cCfxVd4gc6GbsYYHQiH0fAPaPVc8wq+q Me5i0wsi6UYwxlyD1rnI2qBJTDyyqWuyT1Tuqy89k2GU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cwocmIknRfBDxKCxfCBoSPfVTT8UKv8YOsvYxJxoG8V8jt+9ddlG+NQeSd5xLJs+j4HxBIrsi1IC7xYYWCwrk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f793:: with SMTP id j19mr78918vso.196.1542681571185; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:39:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181119235722.GA53159@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20181119235722.GA53159@www.zefox.net> From: Jonathan Chen Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:39:20 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found To: fbsd@www.zefox.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5598473D19 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.06 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.939,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.84)[ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.45), asn: 15169(-1.65), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 02:39:34 -0000 On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 13:25, bob prohaska wrote: [...] > Is there a resolution to this dilemma, other than just waiting for > inkscape to catch up? Is it possible to determine which revision of > the ports tree can make a runnable version of a particular port? The correct thing to do is to build a set of local package repository for your RPI3 system using synth or poudriere. It appears that some of your locally installed packages are out of sync with the ports-tree, and that is a common problem with using non-chrooted/jailed port-builders. I've just built a runnable version of inkscape, so I'm pretty sure the problem is at your end rather than the ports tree. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen