From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 3 19:03:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10395 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 19:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from panix.com (panix.com [198.7.0.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA10389 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 19:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jbarrm@localhost) by panix.com (8.8.5/8.7/PanixU1.3) with SMTP id WAA07265; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:02:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:02:38 -0500 (EST) From: Barry Masterson To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Doug White , "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another 2.1.7 upgrade & no bin dist In-Reply-To: <17423.860116649@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Weird! I wonder if this also happens with the 2.2 installer? > > > > You mean 2.2.0? This was from the 2.2.1 boot.flp. > > No, I meant 2.2.1 - I saw 2.1.7 in the subject line and jumped to > conclusions. ;-) > 2.1.7 originally, just the content has moved on. But to close on the original subject, the source for the bin & sbin Did get installed. It was the binary distribution that never made it. I did a make world the other day, took about 11 hours. Can I safely say that the security risk that was in 2.1.6 is now history with the make world of 2.1.7 ? Barry >--->--->--->--->---> FreeBSD 2.1.7-R <---<---<---<---<---<