From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 23:18:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E63616A41F for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marquezjesse@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8C743D45 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marquezjesse@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so905064wra for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tyE3UuWX5KcQjzFeY3MuVJ5N3c0gE5pSIeNgStj3CqOBegjzKbHSTxmqAWEg0lFuC9J80+T1yr4EDXf8ddbkVqWahoVFw7pFQXMAhNp1KnKldD0skj6vosGIK6ioj4U2J2sJtE2trN9IElcpihnCj9+m3khZqMvlmNB8xJ966dQ= Received: by 10.54.29.44 with SMTP id c44mr329082wrc; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.209? ( [66.194.80.250]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g9sm6482234wra.2005.09.04.16.18.31; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <431B80F0.8060909@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:19:12 -0500 From: jesse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Optimizing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:18:34 -0000 Hi all, Is there any performance gain when using Standard-PC HAL over ACPI-PC HAL? I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE on a abit KR7A(KT266A) motherboard. I currently have APIC disabled in the bios, ACPI disabled at boot and I feel like my system is snappier. Just wondering if there is any truth to this. over and out, Jesse