From owner-cvs-all Sun May 28 10:43: 5 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5669337B6E7; Sun, 28 May 2000 10:43:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (203-165-77-40.sugnm1.kt.home.ne.jp [203.165.77.40]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W 04/27/00) with ESMTP id CAA13350; Mon, 29 May 2000 02:42:52 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id CAA16407; Mon, 29 May 2000 02:42:21 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 02:42:20 +0900 Message-ID: <86og5q372b.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: andrews@technologist.com Cc: shige@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/zsh-devel Makefile ports/shells/zsh-devel/files md5 ports/shells/zsh-devel/patches patch-ad patch-ab ports/shells/zsh-devel/pkg PLIST In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 28 May 2000 09:41:41 -0400" <20000528094141.A4761@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200005271903.MAA19047@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000528094141.A4761@argon.gryphonsoft.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.2 (Raspberry Beret) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Sun, 28 May 2000 09:41:41 -0400, E-Dragon wrote: > Cool! I'll now update shells/zsh too, since it needs updating. Any > idea when they will merge those compdefs into zsh 3.0.x, if ever? I'm not sure, but considering the differences between 3.0.x's syntax of compdefs and 3.1.x's I'd doubt if they [zsh workers] would backport them to 3.0.x. > Also, perhaps we should set NO_LATEST_LINK to zsh-devel. What do you > think? I much prefer zsh-devel to zsh these days. Maybe we could just > merge the ports instead, and nuke zsh-devel. As we discussed a while ago, we could just rename zsh to zsh30 and zsh-devel to zsh31. Since zsh workers are actively maintaining on both 3.0.x and 3.1.x braches, we might consider both of these as "stable" products. (Actually they are stable enough already, IMO) I think we can rename zsh-devel to zsh31 when 3.1.7 release is out, but not now. It seems premature if we (ask PW to) do a repocopy now because zsh-devel is currently of a pre-release... (When it comes to 3.1.8-beta after it becomes zsh31, we can just import the beta as zsh31-devel. by the way) Also, we will move NO_LATEST_LINK from zsh31 to zsh30 then, considering bash1/bash2 pair as a good example to follow. -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org "We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message