From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 12 18:07:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4356B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388B143D1F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:07:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(14024b6bcea376a46a5e60cdb14cd76e@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
	[67.119.53.203])
	by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2D26A3g016654;
	Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1D63A53A2A; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:07:05 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Message-ID: <20040313020704.GA48962@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:07:26 -0000


--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:49:40AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5?
>=20
> I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5.
>=20
> What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? The
> ports tree is the same anyway.

It's not, because the dependencies are different.

Kris

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAUmzIWry0BWjoQKURAoc5AKCrJmDMcjoULNFUs8ZiypRFm0v2KACg4toR
uOB9YFzZVmyyBhvfjYjhGqw=
=ErYj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--