Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:34:14 +0200 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> To: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net> Cc: dim@xs4all.nl, jonny@jonny.eng.br, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler Message-ID: <20010428163414.73d06d94.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <3AEA96F8.C217C8BF@cvzoom.net> References: <20010427194022.A18639@roma.coe.ufrj.br> <200104280127330789.011EEEF5@tensor.xs4all.nl> <20010428093802.59828860.steveo@eircom.net> <3AEA96F8.C217C8BF@cvzoom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 06:10:00 -0400 Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net> wrote: DM> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: DM> > It makes me wonder just how safe -O is :( DM> DM> I think Window Maker compiles parts of its code with -O0. Must be for DM> good reason. I think the only time you're going to see a huge DM> you want to make a program run faster, you've got to write implement DM> better algorithms, and its as simple as that. Beyond that, you'll just Couldn't agree more, the part that was worrying me was that there seem to be indications of problems even with -O, and FreeBSD depends on -O to compile. Hence my wondering above ... -- Optimal hardware acceleration for Windows PC (Mac). 9.81 m/s/s applied for (at least) 2s followed by impact with solid object. Optimal software upgrade FreeBSD (OS-X). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010428163414.73d06d94.steveo>