From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 19 11:50:24 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B80F16A408
	for <bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu)
Received: from daemon.egr.msu.edu (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6382F13C48C
	for <bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu)
Received: by daemon.egr.msu.edu (Postfix, from userid 21281)
	id 5A9F21CC28; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:18:35 -0400
From: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu>
To: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20070419111835.GI35550@egr.msu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: 
Subject: Improper tag on kern/111831?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:50:24 -0000

I looked up the bug report I filed yesterday and it is now tagged [smbfs] 
in the Synopsis.  I am not using smbfs at all; only ffs and nfs have been involved
and I am concerned having a tag of smbfs might affect the attention it receives.
Thanks.