From owner-freebsd-isp  Sat Mar 24 11:11:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from et-gw.etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD16C37B71E
	for <isp@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 11:11:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18])
	by et-gw.etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04894;
	Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:12:11 GMT
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010324142619.03a8a690@mail.etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:28:54 -0500
To: <scanner@jurai.net>
From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: Intel driver doc's Take 2.
Cc: isp@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103241338100.11101-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10103241018130.6262-100000@mail.matriplex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>
>
>         Well then I suggest you ALL start writing Intel every single day
>to RELEASE DOCS WITH NO NDA. Then this problem will go away. Matt had the
>best Idea so far. To take an NDA manual and get Intel to release the basic
>functinoality parts of it openly. And that is what I sent to Linda Sanchez
>at Intel.

You are dealing with a company with more lawyers than FreeBSD has 
users.  it will take them the life of the product to decide what is 
proprietary and what is not.
Whining hackers wont get Intel to change their policy.

dennis


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message