From owner-freebsd-multimedia Wed Sep 3 02:12:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA01733 for multimedia-outgoing; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 02:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA01681 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 02:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA00375; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 02:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199709030909.CAA00375@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: Luigi Rizzo cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (Christoph Kukulies), multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Opti 931 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Sep 1997 08:25:03 +0200." <199709030625.IAA07228@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 02:09:27 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of Luigi Rizzo : > Avoid the Soundblaster cards, as far as I know they have some stupid > internal architecture so that full duplex operation requires to use > 8-bit format on one channel and 16-bit format on the other one. This is > painful for the driver to support, and gives much worse quality > anyways. Beside the SB16 are more expensive than the CS4236. The > only reason I have bought one is to be able to test my code on it > (the power of being a standard....) > Great, Luigi, Jim Lowe and I are in perfect agreement! The CS4231 which was also used on the Sparc workstations is a good quality codec and from the report that I have been hearing from Luigi the CS4236 is also a good choice. Cheers, Amancio