Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:46:23 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd-amd64 List <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: aaccli on AMD64 Message-ID: <66415682-3C84-46DF-8B23-37EECFF11B5E@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <43301DC6.6000809@samsco.org> References: <432FE4A7.3020306@ion.lu> <036001c5bdd0$4b80b2e0$f80a000a@vasimwork> <432FF8E1.5010702@ion.lu> <E45ED744-1C4C-43D0-98CF-07557A160862@khera.org> <43301DC6.6000809@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-4-744012041 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Sep 20, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Scott Long wrote: > It really is a much better idea to use the linux version of the > aaccli. It's much more update and supports recent hardware a lot > better. If it > doesn't work on amd64, please let me know. I was gonna try that. There was a note on one of these lists that the linuxalator on amd64 is actually running i386 mode, so one should expect it to have a chance of working... I just haven't gotten around to enabling the linuxalator on my big iron DB servers which are not allowed to go down :-) Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 --Apple-Mail-4-744012041--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66415682-3C84-46DF-8B23-37EECFF11B5E>