From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Oct 28 17:16:54 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA12795
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 17:16:54 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA12788
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 17:16:52 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA03284; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 17:04:52 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199510290004.RAA03284@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Arcanity in services on servers
To: rcarter@geli.com (Russell L. Carter)
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 17:04:52 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, rcarter@geli.com,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199510282312.QAA17833@geli.clusternet> from "Russell L. Carter" at Oct 28, 95 04:12:19 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 663       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > This discussion is probably getting too arcane for the general
> > list readership; we should probably move it to private email.
> 
> Now, isn't this the sort of thing that should be on hackers?  Where
> else can we get multiplatform design discussions that we can use to
> help figure out where we (and FreeBSD:) should go next?  It gets
> arcane when the discussion gets down to details, which of course is
> where the truth is...

With respect, if it belongs in a public forum, it's one of the
comp.protocols groups.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.