From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 21:44:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACCC68F6 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7790628DB for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.96] (cpc14-cmbg15-2-0-cust307.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.26.1.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s4SLiEFR010187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 May 2014 21:44:16 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: official pkg repo with WITHOUT_X11=true From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 22:44:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20F90EAB-ADC5-468C-9AFD-73F93794C4B2@FreeBSD.org> References: To: Dirk Engling X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 21:44:21 -0000 On 28 May 2014, at 17:10, Dirk Engling wrote: > I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official = repo suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with There aren't currently any plans, but we're now bringing online the = infrastructure for supporting multiple package repositories (for the = new-X.org stuff). We're limited by the time it takes to build the ports = tree (around 24 hours on a fast machine, although a lot of that is a few = outliers), but I think this could be quite fast if it also excludes = anything that has xlib as a dependency, so it would make a lot of sense. David