From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Oct 4 14:27:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74584AF4834; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C192D9; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4A5BDCDC; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5200BDCDB; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r422981 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind911 bind99 To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201609301244.u8UCiSSh043206@repo.freebsd.org> <383dbd77-15a0-ea2b-e909-e24d849e80f7@marino.st> <6a63b844-f762-c885-0dfd-21ff327abce8@marino.st> From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: <611d5e17-7fe2-8a4e-ef21-1accab75c438@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:27:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1wXq5bVwMIw6qjAElVQf1h0N6oHNF4AmR" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 14:27:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1wXq5bVwMIw6qjAElVQf1h0N6oHNF4AmR Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gSXNblloVHX0gQlo1Fshkv2B8Nh3IV3Ux"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <611d5e17-7fe2-8a4e-ef21-1accab75c438@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r422981 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind911 bind99 References: <201609301244.u8UCiSSh043206@repo.freebsd.org> <383dbd77-15a0-ea2b-e909-e24d849e80f7@marino.st> <6a63b844-f762-c885-0dfd-21ff327abce8@marino.st> In-Reply-To: --gSXNblloVHX0gQlo1Fshkv2B8Nh3IV3Ux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 04/10/2016 =C3=A0 16:22, John Marino a =C3=A9crit : > On 10/4/2016 09:18, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 =C3=A0 16:16, John Marino a =C3=A9crit : >>> On 10/4/2016 09:13, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>>> Le 04/10/2016 =C3=A0 16:04, John Marino a =C3=A9crit : >>>>> We build under a very heavy load which flushes out marginally unsaf= e >>>>> ports. >>>> >>>> Ok, so make(1) from dragonfly has the same bug make(1) from FreeBSD = 9 >>>> has, feel free to fix it in dragonfly's port tree. >>> >>> master has bmake 20160818 on it (for last 5 weeks) >>> Release 4.6 has bmake 20141111. >>> Do you know if make bug only applies to master? >> >> I have no idea. I was told the problem was with make(1) on FreeBSD 9,= >> which seemed to be right, as it does not fail at all on FreeBSD 10/11 >> with -j 2-10. > > The -j number is not the only factor here. I've seen ports pass under > very high -j numbers but start failing when the server gets loaded. > > DragonFly has the lastest bmake, modern binutils, modern gcc and it > doesn't have fmake (what freebsd 9 uses). > > Why is it so critical to classify bind910 as jobs safe when there > clearly is a question about it? Let's not immediately assume DF is at > fault here. As I mentioned before, it could easily be the build tests > you're doing aren't sufficient to flush this out. It *was* marked > UNSAFE before, obviously with good reason. (albeit undocumented) It works just fine on all supported FreeBSD versions as it is, like I said, feel free to change it in dragonfly's ports tree. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --gSXNblloVHX0gQlo1Fshkv2B8Nh3IV3Ux-- --1wXq5bVwMIw6qjAElVQf1h0N6oHNF4AmR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJX87xJXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85ISAkQAJKVwgid3LqBAHWzstqLTmIs te/X84mKIxglWMN6DGdKorKHsxT967rywaDpB+UX7wK7ZTRmOvTiRaj+tXecftVR Dov1oX1xP0OXXehu2xXNYuY48OLEedJ/zdTckfIRPO0zwRHsdhlK/HYsscdtDvWi NG/YLrr/g7qlJhSOFj7G7/YkY3y/teyhDq0rSJGKveSvfcERF6KiBm2jQjQOympR v9nLpxnB9dTDytH+dZqgbjQHBFiOaBRs7a1cxLpfwLCxQIp9v+dFCnP6HAhvnbDs ur21EVhLY3EBdVkRFwlup3mJUgUPBHwj9bbAOcLQ9QO1SdYRqYGygeaNs99hLR+D WYH/8pPAr2Ig3XkmvpGWKN5Cidi/W1b4ZxLJQv/8/zwrYOZNJzrSpttqUQzzPGoE qmTAXTFfz1MZLFCcFQbpVtZmOGtEvfvbRNKM6LFyQHcMIjviNMlzlIMC9iVaTfMz XGkGfjguVZE1kc6FhbexCW7kPE5sNn6YWhjwbcuLE9oOMgVoTFK78bSUJ+v1FFa8 WgxSaJ10gtFYwLC1tUa82ohD8Y5TmRCPjDufScYALH8944SjczUVpDDpfOS/C6XE Vhk+edfWjnHaRVl8bLBApsfYRxycCY7sPegklWgTNCI4s1lOmzcsENvntrRL+a7S WW1dhaHJZGPvUHhKF+dN =QZz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1wXq5bVwMIw6qjAElVQf1h0N6oHNF4AmR--