Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:07:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gdb6/files patch-i386%nm-fbsd64.h patch-i386_nm-fbsd64.h Message-ID: <20050408160752.GA79536@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050408050604.GE57061@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200504072256.j37Mu1pd087618@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050408050604.GE57061@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:06:04AM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:56:01PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > obrien 2005-04-07 22:56:01 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Added files: > > devel/gdb6/files patch-i386%nm-fbsd64.h > > Removed files: > > devel/gdb6/files patch-i386_nm-fbsd64.h > > Log: > > Back out rev 1.2 -- it was not approved by the maintainer. > > It was approved by me, because it breaks perforce. Why in the heck > you didn't read the whole thread before doing backout ? It doesn't break Perforce. Perforce users know how to escape it. Just like I experience with Bash and ':'. If you do something as Portmgr you need to be clear it is officially as something discussed by the whole of Portmgr and not just your personal opinion. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050408160752.GA79536>