From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Nov  6 11:40:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA07517
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:40:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07512
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:40:22 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA07285;
	Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd007283; Thu Nov  6 19:36:43 1997
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:34:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NetAtalk doesn't work!?  take two
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971106132519.405A-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971106113047.2954E-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, John Fieber wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > did you read the 2.2.5 errata?
> 
> After upgrading the netatalk stuff, I get a whole pile of:
> 
>  ddp_route: still have no valid route

but, does it WORK?

> 
> messages on the console when booting and before atalkd is
> started. Is that a serious problem or could I comment the printf
> and ignore it?
if it works, then yes.
I still have work to do here..

> 
> Completely unrelated to recent netatalk changes, when atalkd
> runs, it installs around 600 routes.  Since I know next to
> nothing about appletalk, I'm wondering, is normal? 
possibly. what are they..
it might for example install up to 32 routes for a local ethernet
(netranges don't fit into the'netmask' way of doing things very well)
and there could be similar things for other remote nets.

think..
how would you describe
a netrange 10 100-110, using netmasks?

you end up having to install several adjacent binary ranges
to make up that range..

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -john
> 
>