From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 08:54:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC77B1065681 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCA58FC18; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48B667C9.5010408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:54:33 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mcoyles@horbury.wakefield.sch.uk References: <000701c908e9$43d38e70$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> In-Reply-To: <000701c908e9$43d38e70$fd607e0a@Horbury.Internal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure df -h output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:54:37 -0000 Marc Coyles wrote: >> Looks like they did some strange things trying to get it back. Those >> look like nullfs mounts with the same source and destination, which >> makes no sense. What does mount -v show you? >> > > Hi Kris... > > [romarch@golem ~]$ mount -v > /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 715484 async 362440, reads: > sync 16201 async 86) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local) > /dev/ad0s1g on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 3879 async > 1779995, reads: sync 876702 async 63257) > /dev/ad0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 23 async > 145025, reads: sync 588 async 89) > /dev/ad0s1e on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 47 async > 874619, reads: sync 495263 async 13857) > /dev/ad0s1f on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 360454 async > 4721936, reads: sync 2557009 async 121766) > devfs on /etc/namedb/dev (devfs, local) > procfs on /proc (procfs, local) > /libexec on libexec (nullfs, local) > /lib on lib (nullfs, local) > /usr/lib on usr/lib (nullfs, local) > /usr/sbin on usr/sbin (nullfs, local) > /usr/share on usr/share (nullfs, local) > /usr/bin on usr/bin (nullfs, local) > /usr/man on usr/man (nullfs, local) > /usr/X11R6 on usr/X11R6 (nullfs, local) > /usr/libexec on usr/libexec (nullfs, local) > /usr/local/bin on usr/local/bin (nullfs, local) > /usr/local/lib on usr/local/lib (nullfs, local) > /var/spool on var/spool (nullfs, local) > /var/lib on var/lib (nullfs, local) > /var/run on var/run (nullfs, local) > /var/log on var/log (nullfs, local) > /home/tff on tff (nullfs, local) > /tmp on tmp (nullfs, local) > /dev on dev (nullfs, local) > /bin on bin (nullfs, local) > /proc on proc (nullfs, local) Yes, they did something bizarre. Ask them why :) Kris