From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat May 7 07:27:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6F1B31A88; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4B61C9E; Sat, 7 May 2016 07:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r12so12101378wme.0; Sat, 07 May 2016 00:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=BjC2O9axMqnWbRf5V25TLqmFZS8gPja7hrRPzbSUqvA=; b=rOpMXBlmfaWlIE8zFFZvl2rAZaIlN48bEuU+sSOSYp15REbFS/4aU59TQG/zjXfJFx JZLZVf8V6uSiuvc1SyG5IHjXUvGaNp6ctkxU7Y/OmKwT7gGdLaSzHO+QYI3vVq1k5/qd 02kwo7DwwwTeTK1GHrcu0shRH5uTh0BETN2tI3eCxTSVlySvQR3Y7Y1wOa+U+yMFIy8Z RvLhoFlBTT8tVPcd0yhf/lIAAHpGL95W6KJUdOjPch+rHxGQkrbJn+heaZKSDFLm/LjQ HE2YGt1MiNLEQDQ1NHiINtps9n5TziIOFKLG2NCnI5eGODBTiphqjlgt+5Prc69Jp5SI f0eA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=BjC2O9axMqnWbRf5V25TLqmFZS8gPja7hrRPzbSUqvA=; b=BX71/ewno0cIZFF8pY4G+0eaSJK63GT3XdpsC1wJIgNETFzTnrTOg10MA7sYck7ia3 mjtmBtjWx1qXJID/aderzw3D7nxjuKS2+tcVDSURdyLQk6CQoQQBwC2hDFzPcCoFj6a3 DpVRVnsfcHPfGcc8cO0k4pQf3pUy2aDu+RHKQ8rb1QUqHvgvtxQElbGrDWNiawnIyafB 6nLVfYMa37DutAZgbIH2QvGeyYjgHMmlmBNQyDnj+96iG1lNCwaxxFA8zlrkixoqb1N1 PTVkWGqR3Hd7m6+yfgGWxwk2DHEGQq0hSc5Gyprbs+DSzh4tb1NaXTJx34c7XyExOKpv N/tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVtPehKYSRX9uTrEHLhwTP6MskWDoFaCMj/NES3vMxONxHdxATvZmw3n2iljOfdgmZTPcbyghck1p22aw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.63.226 with SMTP id j2mr23458770wjs.27.1462606074561; Sat, 07 May 2016 00:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.16.201 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2016 00:27:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 09:27:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase From: Ben Woods To: Glen Barber Cc: "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 07:27:56 -0000 On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber wrote: > With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed > as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with > the kernel name included in the path (/boot/kernel.${INSTKERNNAME}). In > both cases (source-based upgrades and with pkgbase), the behavior will > remain the same. > > Glen > Hi Glen, With the recent commit mentioned previously, only the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed unless make.conf contains the following line: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no This affects both source-based upgrades (make installkernel) and package building (make packages). Is this the desired behaviour? Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com