From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr  9 15:14:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA20691
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (sunrise.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA20673
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA17986; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:17:19 -0700
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:17:19 -0700
Message-Id: <199604092217.PAA17986@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Question about Motif packages
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I have a question to you guys who have Motif.

(1) Where do they install the libraries and include files?  Are there
    any packages that install them outside /usr/X11R6?

(2) What is the imake support like?  Do they leave "xmkmf" alone,
    providing an extra "mxmkmf" or do they clobber lib/X11/config/* to 
    the state that "xmkmf" isn't the same anymore?

    Specifically, do you think patching the Imakefile to include
    "-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXm" or "/usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a" depending on
    whether the binary is to be built dynamic or static should
    suffice?

    The "patching Imakefile" part is important, because that can be
    done during the patch stage -- we can't patch the resulting
    Makefile without hacking the ports build mechanism quite a bit.

Thanks
Satoshi