Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:33:55 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp redial unsuccessful Message-ID: <20061006213355.GA78459@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <20061006204106.GA41803@epia2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20061004185148.GA1848@roadrunner.q.local> <20061004185911.GA94703@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20061004190611.GB1848@roadrunner.q.local> <45240D81.2080506@mail.txf.com> <20061004212417.GA95104@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20061004213909.GC1848@roadrunner.q.local> <45243F7E.8050708@mail.txf.com> <20061006180202.GB1406@roadrunner.q.local> <20061006204106.GA41803@epia2.farid-hajji.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cpghost wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:02:02PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > I cranked up the debug logging, and compared my ppp login attempts with > > your logfile. I get multiple > > > > Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(12) state = Initial > > Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 213.191.89.20 > > Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. > > Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(13) state = Initial > > Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 213.191.89.20 > > Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. > > > > Using "Google Search" then led me to the follow posts [1], that describe the > > problem in more detail. 'disable ipv6cp' should do the trick, I'll check > > this ASAP. > > Yesterday, I've had a brand new 6.2-PRERELEASE Oct 4th box installed > on T-Com ADSL, using the same ppp.conf from my previous post. I've just > logged into this box and seen a successful disconnect/reconnect, as > always after 24hrs. Everything seems all right with ppp and T-Com ADSL. I guess it depends on the actual hardware on the other side. Different POPs have different hardware (versions) and software (configuration). Let's wait for another 24h to see if I found the solution. Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061006213355.GA78459>