From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 25 08:42:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B639106564A for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from system.jails.se (system.jails.se [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc1e:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF708FC16 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (system.jails.se [91.205.63.85]) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A3D321BB8B for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:42:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.25.0.25] (c-1105e155.166-7-64736c14.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.225.5.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by system.jails.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDCB521BB81 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:42:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:42:08 +0100 Message-Id: <3E3E4094-77E2-490B-9574-5B95ECDED447@pean.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Feb 25 09:42:10 2012 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4f489ee226816799614642 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, D, 0.40000, Received*cipher+AES128, 0.40000, should+use, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message, 0.40000, Message-Id*490B+9574, 0.40000, in+conflict, 0.40000, disks+not, 0.40000, http+//lists, 0.40000, http+//lists, 0.40000, not+partitions!, 0.40000, Hi+Now, 0.40000, of, 0.40000, But, 0.40000, But, 0.40000, Received*2012, 0.40000, says, 0.40000, Subject*zfs+confusion., 0.40000, And+then, 0.40000, Subject*confusion., 0.40000, Received*client+certificate, 0.40000, he, 0.40000, to+like, 0.40000, X-Mailer*(2.1251.1), 0.40000, And, 0.40000, this+seems, 0.40000, Jason+doesn't, 0.40000, use, 0.40000 Subject: glabel, gpart and zfs confusion. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:42:13 -0000 Hi, Now Im really confused.=20 I want in some way label my drives so the setup is independent of = physical setup. But Jason doesn't seem to like glabel at all. :D http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2012-January/013574.html And then he says that you should use gpart instead http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2012-January/013578.html But this seems to be in conflict with the common knowledge that zfs = should be used on whole disks, not partitions! Any pointers?=20=