From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 06:06:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F765CB9 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73077179E for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 06:06:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA25010; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:06:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Z0OHy-00045V-2c; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:06:02 +0300 Message-ID: <556FEA92.4050704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:05:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neel Natu CC: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bhyve: corrupting zfs pools? References: <556D9005.4020802@FreeBSD.org> <556DDDA9.6090005@FreeBSD.org> <556ED071.5030009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 06:06:06 -0000 On 04/06/2015 07:37, Neel Natu wrote: > Ok, there are some differences in our systems. The interesting ones > are number of ASIDs (64 versus 65536), flush-by-asid capability, > vmcb-clean capability and the number of cores. > > I was able to mimic all of these on my Opteron but still wasn't able > to reproduce the issue. I am going to get a Sempron tomorrow which > belongs to the same processor family as the Athlon II so hoping that > it is easier to repro. > > BTW does this happen consistently on your system? Yes, it happened every time I tried that scenario. Thank you very much! If there is anything else that I can do on my side to help the investigation just let me know. -- Andriy Gapon