From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 15:42:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBF51A7 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561FD220 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AD67F33C29; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:01 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Luca Ferrari Subject: Re: pkg assertion failed References: Reply-To: freebsd-questions Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Luca Ferrari's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:55:15 +0100") Message-ID: <44k31rha9i.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:42:02 -0000 Luca Ferrari writes: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> Seems a problem with the package database to me, what should I do? I'm >> running 10.1-release. > > Apparently it was a mix-mismatch of ports and packages. > Issuing a Well, not literally. Once installed, there is no difference. In fact, these days building a port works by building a package without installing anything, and then installing that. > # pkg udate > # pkg upgrade > > fixed the problem. The problem is having some of your installed packages out of synch with each other. "pkg upgrade" is, indeed, the easy way to fix this (just remember to check UPDATING first, as with any method of upgrading the installed packages).