From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 21:11:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3107A1065673; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from emma.lautre.net (emma.lautre.net [80.67.160.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D783D8FC22; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6ACFC114BD; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:11:09 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20080423211109.GO59841@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Alexey Dokuchaev , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200804021938.m32Jcd9J053756@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080403055949.GA4698@FreeBSD.org> <20080403083150.u56fa0rt44804c48@graf.pompo.net> <20080403172652.GF86097@graf.pompo.net> <20080404091602.GC11845@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080404091602.GC11845@FreeBSD.org> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile ports/x11-fonts/indic-ttf Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/indic-ttf/files pkg-message.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:11:12 -0000 Le Ven 4 avr 08 à 11:16:03 +0200, Alexey Dokuchaev écrivait : > > With regards to these explanations, I think that it's better to keep > > these two separate ports. > > Fair enough; all I can add is that bringing the above explanation > (probably in its refined and shortened form) to pkg-descr/pkg-message of > either or both ports (or even as a Makefile comment) might be a good > idea. Done. -- Th. Thomas.