From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 17 12:49:25 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9F937B416; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3HJmeHt030469; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:48:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Master.gorean.org (zoot [127.0.0.1]) by Master.gorean.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3HJmgLr007068; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:48:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by Master.gorean.org (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g3HJmel5007065; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:48:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: Master.gorean.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton X-X-Sender: doug@master.gorean.org To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Subject: etc mfc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020417124043.K4228-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > A entry for ypserv was added into /etc/hosts.allow. However, 4-STABLE > version of ypserv is not linked libwrap, yet. Yes, someone else pointed that out too. I was trying to make ypserv compile with -DTCP_WRAPPERS, but it seems non-trivial, so I just backed out this change. > Though, there is uucp in 4-STABLE, an uucpd entry was deleted from > /etc/inetd.conf. It was not deleted, it was moved. > An IPv6 entry for tftpd was added into /etc/inetd.conf. Though, I > have a plan of MFC, 4-STABLE version of tftpd doesn't support an IPv6, > yet. Thank you, I just backed this one out as well. > And, inetd_enable was changed to NO, silently. It seems POLA > violation. That depends on your perspective on this I suppose... My reasoning at the time was that since all entries in inetd.conf are commented out by default, turning the daemon on by default is silly. Also, users who actually want inetd for something will likely have entries in /etc/rc.conf[.local] either by design, or via sysinstall. However, if you believe strongly that the default should continue to be YES, my feelings won't be hurt if you change it. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message