From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 17 14:31:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA08851 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 14:31:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from X2296 (ppp1673.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.137]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA08845 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 14:30:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA00198; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 17:29:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 17:29:46 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek Reply-To: ac199@freenet.hamilton.on.ca To: Warner Losh cc: Richard Wackerbarth , =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=AFren?= Schmidt , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. In-Reply-To: <199703171822.LAA07363@rover.village.org> Message-ID: X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2 X-Mailer: Pine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > Actually, here's the list > 2.0.x dead > 2.1.x stagnant > 2.2.x stable, by definition Arguably, it's not stable until wcarchive runs it. That could make for an interesting definition of the current -stable: whatever wcarchive is running. -- tIM...HOEk Who's been messing with my anti-paranoi shot?!