From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Feb 6 14:42:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A8837B684 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:42:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id DB4002B5D2; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:42:33 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:42:33 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: "Vadim A. Umanski" Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/24890: make top better Message-ID: <20010206164233.D77020@elvis.mu.org> References: <200102060420.f164K4E44704@freefall.freebsd.org> <3A7FACAB.383329EA@corpit.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A7FACAB.383329EA@corpit.ru>; from umanski@corpit.ru on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:50:03AM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-FEARSOME-20001103 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:50:03AM +0300, Vadim A. Umanski wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 07:15:52PM -0800, davidx@viasoft.com.cn wrote: > > > > > >Description: > > > top command always put idle time field at last in CPU states line, > > > but I think idle time is the most important field in CPU states, > > > could anyone move idle field to first? > > > > I don't think there's enough reason to do that.. > > > > No reason to do that ALWAYS? OK then, just make it an OPTION! An option to reorder one field? Pass. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message