Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:23:35 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade problem Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411141719490.6929-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <20041114132542.N34355@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Doug Barton wrote: > Another (and I think very useful) way to look at this would be to > declare certain ports _directories_ "leaf" directories in the sense that > ports whose frameworks live within them should not be depended on by > other ports. Right, that's what I was implying, although my sentence structure was probably bad. When I last looked at the problem in March, in the existing 'really are leaves' categories there were ... 680 ports. With the repocopies, japanese would add another 430 today. So, about 10% in all, and that's why I didn't really push for it at the time. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0411141719490.6929-100000>