From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 2 20:20:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5318D82D; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063961539; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n16so6149261oag.41 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:20:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dQcUy6rEqwDWXoA839xHOTbwbfkMXh1ztiJIN5NZK1w=; b=p45bCd2QBezOy3xjmQh13Yct5j3djVxJu4CX1d6PY6rR9CUJ9bZzGP4I8rWuABz7K0 yZXlCRUc2KhokNjAx7YQVX1UBXASAkH6X4YF9LjyPnqnMsG/KMQar5LqEaRX/fVAaZEe hRmUBAVe+ZnWUsdFXnS+rzYdUEkz8mIhQ3Q/Qg81N1ojz5KefrrD61c28A0ZkVolv8Bp nTo18qQfkDfj9zIFb3sVb0J84qrlNziF8ghFsKYCA4p31vabbBdtQTCBMJ5OFf3M4dja 4rcVyrN+hstcbV8VKr8IazkUxaoaUNHS/b8UeYDmXDRUEoiX7Iznqx0kWvzS4dvtMBRb 1xKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.148.106 with SMTP id tr10mr42695obb.65.1393791640873; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:20:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.78.71 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:20:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <530EBCDB.1090303@delphij.net> <53138FA6.1060705@delphij.net> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 15:20:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UDP Lite support From: Joe Nosay To: Xin LI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:20:42 -0000 On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: >> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been >> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged >> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure >> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context. What is the >> >>>>>> question? What thread are you referring to? If this is >> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more >> >>>>>> appropriate than -current. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -- Brooks >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on >> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the >> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html >> > >> > Looks >> >>>>> >> > like nobody proposed a patch? >> > >> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world >> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that >> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self >> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other >> > operating systems. >> > >> > Cheers, >> >>> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma >> >> >> >> Not my project; but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to >> >> get it to build from source. Use your raspberry pi with FreeBSD >> >> to broadcast your tunes and all. >> >> >> > >> > >> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to >> > improve the code. >> >> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing >> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff >> >> Are you interested in working on these and report back? >> >> Cheers, >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd >> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc >> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA >> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz >> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D >> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W >> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S >> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT >> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m >> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI >> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU >> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia >> =2Vmc >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > > I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with > the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping > it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory. > Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right? > One not one in first sentence. Insert hurt between not & when in last sentence.