Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 01:41:22 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Dima Ruban <dima@rdy.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [ports@geeksrus.net: palm/pilot-link: changes to support p5-PDA-Pilot slave port] Message-ID: <20020221064122.GB41743@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020221062742.GA57377@sivka.rdy.com> References: <20020221062742.GA57377@sivka.rdy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:27:42PM -0800, Dima Ruban wrote: >Could somebody please review this patch? I need to make sure that it's >consistent with the rest of the tree. I don't know if there's another pair of ports like these two. PDA::Pilot is really a completely separate package that just happens to live in a subdir two levels deep inside the pilot-link tree, and requires that the pilot-link configure be run before its own. IOW, it's pretty gross. E.g., one thing that seems to stand out is that most other master-slave port pairs are differentiated by prefix/suffix, rather than being named something completely different. Do you want to take maintainership of p5-PDA-Pilot, too, since the two are incestuously related? I'll happily let you have it if you want? I'd be surprised if it ever needs any changes, except for pilot-link .soname updates, unless the pilot-link tree gets rearranged. -- Alan Eldridge "Dave's not here, man." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221064122.GB41743>