From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 27 08:44:54 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F0F16A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB86343D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so130467wra
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=DNEdmsDfPP2F/fTqpzquK3dv/dXR8dw2/ENM6EPb6e9x8Nwz36dSnaoITC0OYktw6cG+sndRNJ1Y2y5r2GErGFQJgRc/0o0CXdjPWeC03eWPLkMbt1XOoET20+zSLOCkSVjSxKddBBBa58ImfpfwywxP/4Y7QX6e1sOyB4Jhw5I=
Received: by 10.54.129.7 with SMTP id b7mr250494wrd;
	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ef10de9a050727014436bd1cd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:44:52 -0500
From: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>
To: Graham Bentley <gbentley@uk2.net>
In-Reply-To: <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050727043609.DF53E16A42F@hub.freebsd.org>
	<50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again (Andrew P.)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 08:44:54 -0000

On 7/27/05, Graham Bentley <gbentley@uk2.net> wrote:
> > "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's
> > not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least
> > 99%-Windows-networking-compatible.
>=20
> Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible
> with Windows.
>=20
> (Until M$ changes something ie tries to fix its own bugs
> and makes some others OR are new 'features' introduced
> deliberately ???)
>=20
> Any advice on tuning up TCP / IDE Disk IO / Samba on 5.4
> would be interesting !!!
>=20

I wish you could run Netware on top of BSD... I think Novell made a
very smart move adopting Linux into it's portfolio.