From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 22:45:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA4C106566C for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 22:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from chronos.org.uk (chronos-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:12b::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B968FC16 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 22:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workstation1.localnet (workstation1.local.chronos.org.uk [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:12b::20]) (authenticated bits=0) by chronos.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q42MjSMk020405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 23:45:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 chronos.org.uk q42MjSMk020405 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=chronos.org.uk; s=mail; t=1335998728; bh=EdUdksu7rB5rsU+E4Gng16QHRVZCdLe4vulArsjLeVQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=DEli2GNOy0OGwm3oH5AOo6c9X4Np47WT1FL3w+26e3Hrl+Mys0HnIrAcqI1bzeGm5 Uuh/hbh8Oo7SSv6PEmDiCkbHnt7THU8HjoQR7wJ/Ffrkkdeo02atmErNvt6sQEa2WY N+L6L6wyzM1HbE3vDXsF40lCi14q/qzjDz7Ca2Lc= From: Matt Dawson To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 23:45:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201205022201.50506.matt@chronos.org.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Face: -a*{KS?gYyH>pt=1?H+(>B2Z'>b6WxX:^O@+VaMV>l\tOh@[x`#&AHSdl`m<-EEhk=1%t9iRthI|; ~8)mN@qxJ}x5l:zhDO( =?utf-8?q?=2Eas=0A?= NeO!\oL7huHfsoF'I5,0G+Yo[G-G"FG,l`QJ$IgwH/[\a]vRH^'=`; cY+*_{Or` MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205022345.27904.matt@chronos.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (chronos.org.uk [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:12b::1]); Wed, 02 May 2012 23:45:28 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_PASS, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on central.local.chronos.org.uk Subject: Re: OpenSSL and Heimdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 22:45:32 -0000 On Wednesday 02 May 2012 23:14:41 Mark Felder wrote: > Why go out of your way and use mod_gnutls? Because it supports TLSv1.[1|2], which was the PP's question, whereas OpenSSL doesn't and doesn't show any signs of doing so in the near future: https://www.openssl.org/support/funding/wishlist.html Note well the "If and when." IE might be the only client with support for those protocols right now but somebody has to lead the way on the server side or you end up with a mutual apathy loop (AKA positive can't be arsed feedback loop). -- Matt Dawson GW0VNR MTD15-RIPE