From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 12 04:21:55 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA27039 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 12 May 1995 04:21:55 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA27014 ; Fri, 12 May 1995 04:21:40 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA01070; Fri, 12 May 1995 19:21:33 +0800 Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 19:21:33 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= cc: jkh@FreeBSD.org, mr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pine port In-Reply-To: <199505120653.XAA03591@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 May 1995, Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote: > > This thing still doesn't have pkg files...come on, there should be > *someone* using pine out there, no? ;) Ummm... I do. :) I think I even have the Makefile and FreeBSD object files stuffed away in a tarball.gz somewhere. Should the package include the Pine, Pico and IMAP binaries, or just Pine itself (plus support files)? -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org