From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 16:30:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FFE106564A for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05C48FC1F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject; b=XoaILv9eHJo81YtGRvtBOpY87Eg7kAGFzuERjP/IKhX88734c8Olsq92rZjBPhhsNwjP82VRr+lc1aeYuKGA3w373+JjCUctmVEd3MQoep93Y63N6hIeGI/njcW0PY/loPvU7ye03l7POSMC2rcvBqLIcLVgbJ3mA2ZBtLIscFQ=; Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25]) by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1JgjC3-000FPN-6y; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:18:39 +0400 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:18:38 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Patrick Dung Message-ID: References: <763154.59087.qm@web54302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <763154.59087.qm@web54302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature request X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:30:23 -0000 Patrick, good day. Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:18:56AM -0700, Patrick Dung wrote: > 4. LVM and file systems > > As of FreeBSD 7.0, ZFS is ported. > This is great as FreeBSD do not have LVM in the past. FreeBSD has gvinum since approximately 5.x and vinum since rather old days (3.0). Is something wrong with these LVMs? -- Eygene