From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 06:35:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3233E16A469 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portcitycs@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3E113C461 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portcitycs@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2901324pyb.10 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:35:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=KnpLI3+YRW2vaODfCV9aag22zboCPXs9pzw7ChdKe8E=; b=peSoY9qES4ia/TrcKkUcur7uW0kmhnqw++RtX+hTcSAM/j8zs6GTXdp8bvX5q1v/E1fZ4f1qC8ejbI9IIKnLugnOy0hH2EZwvz0yzdyUdd2rYWim3bPCIBfYYRR+ZcdAO5OU7DOe9k6KX48zsDn3jqDG1zPYV/HBBMs+EyJLS/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=jX1fSoA4aVfbCKsjW7BDuWHj+Xs/9y04Kj1/iehhZ+joIl/YC3N7B4lHLvdL1r4fPbJKZYVXDHJdN62EXnIpXUJ22dNEJe6561iiCct62Pe1xNkJ944mcXhxu/IeXcBlXBLANVGhV3vAQEdnUBUpBwdV7njX28571kKKof0mNHQ= Received: by 10.142.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr2265435wfc.122.1200292533542; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.47.12 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:35:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a1835cd0801132235q4de087c6p42fac3da420f16f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:35:33 -0500 From: "Lyle Scott III" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: question about captive wifi portal... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:35:35 -0000 I am experimenting more to make a small captive (wifi) portal system. I would like to use pf. I have been looking into authpf and it is a pretty good fit for what i need... but the users won't be SSHing to get allowed. Is there another way around this? Does anyone else have and suggestions or links that could be helpful? I also thought i could just use packet marks, but I am just unaware of anything else to make the pf packets more dynamic... i guess that would be the goal of this post -- Lyle Scott, III http://www.lylescott.ws