From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 2 17:59:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C9737B404; Thu, 2 May 2002 17:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0034.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.34] helo=mindspring.com) by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 173RQM-0001JT-00; Thu, 02 May 2002 17:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: <3CD1E0E4.86406459@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:59:16 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" , John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: savcore dump names? References: <20020503002436.98DA538FD@overcee.wemm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm wrote: > "Andrew R. Reiter" wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > :I was doing this: 8^p. > > > > Damn, then why post at all? That's crap. > > Agreed. We have better things to do than sort through intentionally bogus > email. So, just to recap and document for posterity: o Directly complaining about Poul, and doing nothing to change the code, other than trying to browbeat Poul into it: o Good o Inside the list charter o Indirectly complaining about people complaining about Poul by documenting how to trivially undo what Poul did, and thus implicitly suggesting backing out "undesirable changes" instead of simply bitching about them: o Bogus o Outside the list charter Correct? I frequently disagree with Poul's methods and design decisions, but that's no reason for personal attacks, or I'd be posting them myself. --- So... Can I ask AGAIN that the people who have a problem with the MD5 changes PLEASE describe acceptable-to-them savecore(8) behaviour, other than just saying "put it back"? Saying "the way it was" is not a design specification. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message