Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:40:11 +0200
From:      Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: python 2.7 marked as deprecated and EOL while 2.7.18 RC is available
Message-ID:  <0d2adba2-2a8e-3960-90c3-193f62420b6f@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <86685354-ea84-6ea4-e230-51cef83fd803@druid.net>
References:  <CAGnMC6rNeUT2wQ=DsrvkNtVz_SGqfKA8Yh=1rbeMS8XtxB3naw@mail.gmail.com> <102F7F34-78D0-45D8-A6CD-54C90BD46791@FreeBSD.org> <24218.18351.39302.604589@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <b16f5e5c-5283-9a14-b738-eff635c14109@m5p.com> <24218.25496.502886.46431@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <bb862ff4-33f2-f5af-450a-72a33105759e@FreeBSD.org> <20200418090615.jl25cg3jhzcdrkcb@ozzmosis.com> <86685354-ea84-6ea4-e230-51cef83fd803@druid.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--3MecXr8dMb3QVRnojLe63i4OF6kciZoSL
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9e2TsYd9rtR4tg8s6seEpvLhFYOeBoR4H"

--9e2TsYd9rtR4tg8s6seEpvLhFYOeBoR4H
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18/04/2020 11:57, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> I tried building lilypond with python2.7 removed from USES but its
> configure script failed due to Python < 3.0.  I couldn't find any
> discussion about upgrading the version of Python but WikipediA says tha=
t
> it has 120,000 lines Python code.  As far as I can tell there is nothin=
g
> as good as Lilypond for engraving music.  It would be quite a blow to
> musicians if that was removed.
I think I can reassure you that lilypond isn't going away (at least not
because of the Python 2 vs. 3 issue.) Currently I'm maintaining
lilypond-devel and have already created a patch updating to 2.21.0 not
depending on Python 2 any more. I've already planned to take care of
updating lilypond to 2.20.0 as soon as I'll be able to. Maybe that would
mean backporting the upstream changeset switching to Python 3. (The
change was done well before the 2.20.0 release, but it seems to only be
present in the 2.21 branch. Luckily the changes are fairly trivial, but
because so many files are touched still would mean quite some legwork.)

Regards,
Martin

--=20
X is a large contribution.


--9e2TsYd9rtR4tg8s6seEpvLhFYOeBoR4H--

--3MecXr8dMb3QVRnojLe63i4OF6kciZoSL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=M3uS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MecXr8dMb3QVRnojLe63i4OF6kciZoSL--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0d2adba2-2a8e-3960-90c3-193f62420b6f>