From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 08:06:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B81065673 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61D28FC1A for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YsO-0006Zq-IO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:06:52 +0200 Received: from c-82-209-158-57.cust.bredband2.com ([82.209.158.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:06:52 +0200 Received: from mc by c-82-209-158-57.cust.bredband2.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:06:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Cardell Widerkrantz Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:06:40 +0200 Organization: Temple of the Moby Hack Lines: 12 Message-ID: <864o09ymzz.fsf@brain.hack.org> References: <20110916063153.200375qdq59crf8c@mail.top-consulting.net> <32990703-D068-4B0D-AF3A-C1E6EA0A4100@elde.net> <20110916101833.17485ybnq5srjbc4@mail.top-consulting.net> <20110916173956.18133qtvqi91m3wg@mail.top-consulting.net> <4E749394.1090607@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-82-209-158-57.cust.bredband2.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4p3fmYrk+JlsjUCnzJyB28qLtsc= Subject: Re: FS of choice for max random iops ( Maildir ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:06:56 -0000 Volodymyr Kostyrko , 2011-09-17 14:33 (+0200): > You really like to wait for hours before fsck will finish checking for > your volume? While it's true that fsck on large filesystems takes ages soft updates and background fsck makes it a lot less bothersome than it used to be. -- http://hack.org/mc/ Use plain text e-mail, please. HTML messages silently dropped. OpenPGP welcome, 0xE4C92FA5.