Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:24:52 +0100 From: Adam J Richardson <fatman.uk@gmail.com> To: Eric <heli@mikestammer.com> Cc: Miguel <mmiranda@123.com.sv>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: porteasy vs portupgrade Message-ID: <46A8CAD4.3070804@crackmonkey.us> In-Reply-To: <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com> References: <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us> <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> <46A8B301.7080903@mikestammer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<snip> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > try portmaster as a replacement to portupgrade. No dependencies and it > works great. Hi Eric, I tried portmaster one time when I got mad with portupgrade. It's great that it has no dependencies, but I didn't like it at all. Can't remember why - it just didn't work for me. I think portupgrade probably ruined me with things like portversion and pkg_deinstall. I'm too lazy for portmaster. Adam J Richardson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A8CAD4.3070804>