From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:48:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDD5C6 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74A32243 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s79Mm7mL036835 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 22:48:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192537] Port Update: devel/boost-* Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:48:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 22:48:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192537 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- PRs are cheap and public, and appropriate if you have patches. If it's just "hey, there's a newer version available" then PRs are not appropriate. Especially if it's on sourceforge, the maintainers already know about updated versions availability because portscout sends an email and tracks it. Anyway, it's fine. office@ knows now and can close the PR if they want. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.